You meet up with your client, after having arrived half an hour early. But as you approach the building, you watch a man in all black, walk out quite urgantly. You approach the other person, your actual client. He looks like the definition of a code monkey, skin parched as if he hasnt seen sun in months. He introduces himself as one Saul Lariat. He is one of the co-founders of Shinign Eye Securty, but he took a bad deal wherein he signed off all the publicity for a slight pay rise. But now his co-founder, Mike Simonac, wants to get him out withouot having to pay anymore. Saul is claiming that he is innocent, and this could very well be a framing job. As you travel around the bank, you find 3 major things you know you can use as evidence.

1: You requested to pull the bank security camera footage. Watching it over, you notice something strange. There is a small jump in the footage. You check again, and you notice the timestamp in the bottom right corner jump from 11:34 AM to 1:32 AM as the day counter suddenly rolls over. You decide to download the nights footage and save it for later.

2: After pacing around for a bit, you decide to search the recent files, finding the latest transaction log. It is for a person under the name Fredrick Jalbanos. The man had made a large depoosit in only cash. Underneath there is a note from the teller who had to evacuate the building as you walked in. It reads as follows: "As I was walking back to the vault, I noticed something odd. Yes the cops were called for a robbery, but as I deposided Mr. Jalbanos's money, I barely noticed anything different about the vault. If there wasy anything taken, it was in extreamly small amounts that it would have taken our weekly count to even notice. And the vault was still in mint condition, despite being broken into. The culprit has to have gotten in with keys that only select tellers and above have."

3: Out of curiosity, you ask your client "Do you beleive you have anything to help your case?" Saul replies, after a few seconds: "I do have some documentation for a perscription I was supposed to pick up tday, but I wasn't able to make it because I had to crunch out a deadline." He hands you the aforementioned papers, and you decide to read over it yourself to try to make sense of what he had just said. All the documentation looks quite clear and official, stating a pickup time for an experimental ADHD medication, at 11:00 PM.

You feel your phone buzz in your pocket. "COURT CASE FOR STYLIAC V LARIAT: 2:00 PM. ARRIVE AT 1:30 PM." You check the clock, seeing the time as 12:30 PM. You know you have to start heading out with your client, and ony the drive there, you hope you found all you need for this case, knowing it is all you will get.